Saturday, 31 March 2007

Turkey again

Twrci a'r UE

Turkey is once more on the EU agenda. On Thursday talks will resume, to try and get Turkey back on track for EU accession. Discussions began a year and a half ago. They were suspended between the 27 EU member nations and Turkey in December, because of disagreements over Cyprus -Euronews


Yes, by now you would have thought that Turkey would have put up its hands in despair or frustration and just said: "Oh fxxx the EU!". They are after all a proud and patriotic bunch, who could give even the Argentinians a run for their money when it comes to machoism. But Turkey's role in the future of Europe is an important one, and Cyprus in my view is not the most important barrier between Turkey and EU membership, despite the emphasis given to Cyprus on Euronews.

Islam

Yes, yes, Turkey is of course a Muslim nation, but despite the wailing and gnashing of teeth of the Vatican, it is most definately not an Islamic nation in the political sense. Turkey is a strictly secular nation, and has been for a long time. If the many Turks that I know in Berlin are anything to go by, you're average urban or suburban Turk is about as likely to go to a mosque as your average Welshman is of going to a chapel.
Having said that, Turkey would be an invaluable asset to the EU when it comes to the Middle East and trying to find resolutions to the various conflicts that have arisen there.

Size, Poverty and Population

This for me is one of the cons (as opposed to pros) when it comes to accession. Turkey is geographically larger than any single current member of the EU and has a population of over 72 million, which would make it the second largest population after Germany, which in turn would give Turkey the second largest voice in EU politics. Of course, that's democracy, but personally I'm worried about the poverty factor in conjunction with its size and population, not the democratic factor. The EU has just doubled in size and population, and with the accession this year of Romania and Bulgaria we already have a serious poverty factor to resolve. I can't help thinking that if the EU continues to expand at such a fast pace then, like a balloon, it is in danger of bursting.

Kurdistan

There may not be blood in the streets right at the moment, but the Kurdistan factor remains unresolved. Autonomy for the Kurds and equal rights for their culture and language are essential if Turkey is to become a member of the EU. Otherwise -sooner or later- we are going to have one hell of a problem on our hands.

New Edition: Ordovicius

Just a quick note to let you know that Ive finished editing this blog and its previous posts, so that it reflects my take on things rather than being just half-arsed electioneering (and let me make it quite clear that Im currently not a member of any party. I'll let you know if and when this changes). Ive changed the name too. "Ordovicius" is the singular for "Ordovicii" the ancestors of us lot in Gwynedd back in Roman times. No pun on the English word "vicious" is intended!

Political evolution

Adeiliad newydd y Cynulliad

As you denizens of the Welsh Blogosphere are aware, we're nearing our third trip to the Assembly polls. From my extensive experience of mainland European decentralised politics, particularly in Germany and Spain, I believe it is inevitable that we are approaching an evolution in Welsh politics regarding how people will vote.
In short, sooner or later the voter who votes X at the UK general elections will vote Y, Z or even W in the Welsh elections. In other words: he's getting canny.
We'll already get an inkling of this in May, assuming that Ceredigion and Anglesey don't mirror the results of 2005, but the real proof will come in 2011, when the Welsh people will have had four years experience of a legislative Assembly Government, though they have already had time to get used to the very different make-up of our political scene, namely that we have four main parties instead of just two and a half.

Friday, 30 March 2007

The Friday after

Y Bae

Yes, the Friday after the closing of the second Assembly, and what is more the Friday after the launching of two of the four Welsh manifestos. Waiting for Labour's manifesto will no doubt prove as stimulating as watching paint dry in slow motion, though somewhat less instructive and thought-provoking.
We'll no doubt be entertained by the odd TV debate between now and May the third, but in Welsh politics when you've seen them once you've seen them all. Election night itself will of course keep us up and buzzing until the break of dawn, but what hope is there of us experiencing any real political adrenalin rushes between now and then?

And here is the problem with Welsh politics: we have no point of reference. In Scotland as in most parts of the world outside of the People's Republic of China, Belarus and Zimbabwe, they have these handy little things called opinion polls that come out pretty much on a weekly basis, and which give us and our political candidates a rough idea of just how well they are performing, motivating them to try that little bit harder and turning the whole campaign into something that truly engages the interest of the public. It's the original Reality TV experience: Will he/she make a gaff? How will that question be answered? What will be the retort? Will someone go red or even blue in the face? For those of us who already know if and how we'll be voting it all becomes as exciting as watching our favourite team play football...well almost.

But without polls to let us keep up with the score it all becomes pointlessly dull. Who cares if there's a gaff? Who care's what the question was? Why even bother with the retort? The polls say nothing, there are no polls, and tomorrow we will all be as equally clueless about the mood in Wales as today.

So if any of you blogging politicos are reading this, please give some thought to trying to resolve the lack of polls in Wales, because if you really want more people to be interested in politics, then you have to make politics more interesting to people.

Thursday, 29 March 2007

Tories trash Wales ?

David Cameron

Today both David Cameron and Nick Bourne seemed to be slandering Wales as a nation and as a people, revealing a lack of sensibility that for me was an uncomfortable reminder of the Tory arrogance of the past. I'm sure they mean well, but they really ought to think about the implications of what they're saying, especially Nick Bourne, who until now had been doing so well in changing the Welsh Tory image.

In the launch of their manifesto today David Cameron made reference to the "fantasy of Welsh independence". Woah there Dave! You're implying that the people of Wales are in some way inferior to the Scots, the Irish, the English and indeed the rest of mankind in their ability both to govern themselves and to choose how to govern themselves when you use such words. You're also insulting the sensibilities of a growing number of our population and forgetting the fact that it's the Nationalists who are the leaders of the opposition here in Wales, not the Conservative Unionists. Independence is part and parcel of Welsh politics, and calling it "fantasy" only serves to portray the Tories as being out of touch (=condescending) with Welsh politics.
Whether the Welsh people eventually opt for independence or not, it is ultimately a matter of choice, not of ability. By all means argue the cause of Unionism, but when you argue against independence you should do so using arguments that do not patronize the Welsh.

Nick Bourne

To make things worse, tonight on ITV's Waterfront Nick Bourne, when asked why it was necessary for the UK Tory leader to attend the manifesto launch answered that it was right for him to do so and that Plaid Cymru would have done the same but for the fact that they have no "National Leader". Plaid do in fact have a National Leader, Mr Bourne, that Nation being Wales. You should know better by now, Mr Bourne, than to imply that Wales is anything other than a nation. To do so would make you undeserving of any role in our National Assembly. You meant "UK leader", please try to remember that.

The Tories have gone some way in "becoming Welsh", but they still have some way to go, even on the internet. The Welsh Tories still have to learn to become a Welsh party which stands on its own two feet, has its own unique and 100% bilingual website, and has a leader who is not merely the sidekick of the UK leader. This last lesson equally applies to the Liberal democrats. Rhodri Morgan, to be fair, has succeeded in this. For us, the Welsh, the UK leader is in effect the English leader, and we need our Welsh leaders to at least appear to be their Welsh counterparts, not their underlings.

A chance for change?

Make a difference

Well, whether Plaid have a First Minister is one question, but they definately have the first manifesto. It makes seven pledges to the Welsh people, offering them the chance to make a difference and free Wales from the economic and social quagmire that Labour has created.

1. A Plaid Government will cut energy use by 10% - Saving you money and saving the environment.

2. A Plaid Government will provide affordable childcare in every community.

3. A Plaid Government will give all eleven-year-olds their own laptops for learning.

4. A Plaid Government will help reduce the debt burden of graduates who live and work in Wales.

5. A Plaid Government will introduce a first home grant of up to £5,000 to help people with the cost of buying their first home.

6. A Plaid Government will slash the business tax burden on small and medium businesses.

7. A Plaid Government will create a new Community Health Service - nurses at school, check-ups at work and 'Centres of Wellbeing' the length and breadth of Wales.


Manifesto launch in Cardiff

Plaid launch manifesto

Wednesday, 28 March 2007

Sticks and stones

Rhodri Morgan

Today in the Assembly Labour AMs, rallying to the First Minister, did what they do best in the run up to an election. They bombarded the other three parties with insults and congratulated themselves on their alleged efficiency in a cringeworthy display of sycophancy. The recipients of these insults -the opposition leaders- were of course not given any opportunity to reply to the schoolyard name-calling, but then again Labour's display of immaturity was reward enough in itself. Feeling smug with himself after calling the opposition "Jaundiced Jeremiahs", the First Minister no doubt believes he has somehow scored some points. But unlike the Prime Minister's Questions, or even the Scottish First Minister's Questions, such antics will not find their way onto the news, not even onto our political programmes. For the most part the Assembly sessions are a refreshing change from the jingoism of other chambers, and I thank the stars that we haven't gone down the road that the Scots have on this matter. I have only recently watched the Scottish First Minister's Questions so I can only hope that the purile cat-calling that I was exposed to was merely electioneering and not representative of the normal state of affairs in Holyrood.
To be fair I also have to point the finger at Ieuan Wyn Jones' approach at questioning. And as a Welsh speaker I don't see why two Welsh speakers in the Assembly -Mr Jones and Mr Morgan- have to talk to eachother in English at all. Too often Welsh speaking AMs will resort to English in order to employ a bit of spin, but I ask you: to what end? Just think about who exactly is watching S4/C2 in the first place. Will spin impress them? Of course not. Will it catch a headline? Not in any newspaper that any significant number of Welsh people read.

Defending a Free Wales

Byddin

Recently on the blog Annibyniaeth i Gymru and it's English version Welsh Independence the subject of the future shape of the Welsh Armed Forces if Wales were independent was discussed. So here I present an impression of what Wales' Armed Services would look like in a Free Wales, based on the Irish Defence Forces:

The Role of the Armed Forces

Due to Wales' geographic location on the north-western borders of the European Union, it isn't likely to face an external threat or invasion in the future. The Welsh State has a policy of remaining neutral, and for these reasons the military ability of Free Wales is a modest one. However, the state contributes to United Nations peace-keeping operations across the world.

The work of the Armed Forces includes:

  • Preparation to defend Wales from external attacks.

  • Aid the Heddlu (Welsh Police), including internal state security.

  • Peace-keeping on United Nations operations.

  • Miscellaneous civil contingency duties requested by the Government such as search and rescue, air ambulance provision, providing secure air transport for ministers, assistance in the event of natural and other disasters, ensuring the maintenance of essential services, and assisting in dealing with oil pollution at sea.


  • Milwyr

    The Army

    There are approximately 8,500 men and women serving in the Welsh Army with 13,000 in the army reserve. There are two infantry brigades, one in the North and one in the South. There is also a Training Centre and several special establishments, such as the Equitation School, Army Bands, and the Rangers (the Welsh version of the SAS) who are used for special ops.

    Awyrlu

    The Airforce

    The smallest of the Armed Forces, there are around 850 men and women serving in the Welsh Air Corps. The Airforce aids in search-and rescue operations and in preparing secure transport for the Government. It also offers an air ambulance service in a crisis and gives support to the Army and the Navy, including aiding the Navy to police the territoriel waters of Wales and preparing transport for the Rangers.

    Llynges

    The Navy

    There are around 1000 men and women serving in the Welsh Navy, which polices Wales' territorial waters. The Navy's work includes:

  • Protecting Fisheries

  • Aiding the Civil Power

  • Drug Interdiction

  • Maritime Security

  • Diving Operations

  • Pollution Control

  • Overseas Mission Support


  • The Navy has eight offshore patrol vessels.

    Milwyr Cymru Rydd

    Tuesday, 27 March 2007

    Plaid party political broadcast 2007

    Saturday, 24 March 2007

    Labour antics improve Plaid's prospects?

    Adam Price MP
    Adam Price MP today in Caernarfon

    Once again Labour displayed their fears that Plaid Cymru poses them a real threat in May's elections with yet another inept attempt to portray Plaid as Tory bedfellows, as if the public has already forgotten how Labour had to share a bed with the Conservatives in Westminster this month to push the renewal of Trident through parliament.
    They sent their candidate Martin Eaglestone to the conference to ask Mr Price and Mr Wyn Jones to sign a contract stating that they would rule out working with the Conservatives in the event of a hung assembly.
    However, this weak excuse for a media stunt backfired when Adam Price, the MP for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr, asked Mr Eaglestone if he would deliver a contract to Labour calling for the end of illegal wars, no more nuclear weapons and a stop to hospital cuts. In answer Mr Eaglestone ran away.

    Once again Plaid Cymru made its stance on any future coalitions clear: it is open to coalition offers if no single party wins a majority at May's election.

    And echoing a similar statement made two days ago by Ieuan Wyn Jones, the campaigns director Adam Price MP, said Plaid would refuse to serve as a junior party to a Tory First Minister.

    If they could form a government after 3 May they would talk to Labour, Lib Dems, and "yes...talk to the Conservatives".

    "We will invite them to talk with us every day of every week", he told the party spring conference in Caernarfon.

    Labour=Snail Ambition


    Only a few weeks ago a survey indicated that the majority of people in Wales did not know who Ieuan Wyn Jones is. Even so, at the beginning of the month conservative estimates on the results of next May's elections offered by Welsh Tory Guto Bebb (so that makes them "conservative" estimates with a big "C") suggested that Plaid Cymru could win as many as 15 seats in the Assembly. Now thanks to Welsh Labour's antics -including giving prominence to Plaid Cymru's candidate for First Minister on their own website's homepage- more and more people in Wales are finding out both who he is and -thanks to the resulting media coverage- what Plaid Cymru are offering Wales.

    Plaid Cymru's prospects in May could improve on a daily basis if voters get to watch Welsh Labour commiting a slow and drawn-out political hara-kiri.

    Friday, 23 March 2007

    Political debate vs schoolyard whinging

    Y Ddraig Goch

    What really lets the Welsh public down and undermines their confidence or interest in Welsh politics is the schoolyard type attitude Welsh Labour employ in lieu of engaging in political debate on any issues at all. With just over a month to go towards the elections we see all the other parties gearing up for a campaign on bread-and-butter issues in an attempt to persuade voters that their way is best; and what are Labour doing? Telling people that Ieuan Wyn Jones is a "weak daffodil"! Is that mature political debate? I think not.

    Cross-party voting

    Labour say "a vote for Plaid is a vote for Tory", pointing out how many times those two parties have voted together to block Labour in the Assembly, and conveniently forgetting how many times Plaid Cymru have voted with Labour against the Tories in order to maintain the stability of Welsh government. And the bare-faced cheek of it after depending on Tory votes to renew Trident!

    Coalitions

    As any Welsh voter knows, the Assembly is elected using a mixed member PR system, a system similar to those used in the election of governments across Europe. Under the system, it is virtually impossible to win a majority. In consequence coalitions have to be made, compromises reached, and as a result -if the politicians are good at their job- a wider proportion of the public see the things they voted for being implemented.
    When Welsh Labour finally saw sense and formed a coalition with the Lib-Dems one had hoped that this lesson in the reality of PR politics had been learned. Had it? Like Hell! After the 2003 elections, and with only 30 seats (giving them a so-called "majority" of 1) Labour decided to go it alone. To do so was not only foolish in the extreme (as the subsequent loss of that so-called majority proved), it was an arrogant disregard for the stability of Welsh government, a stability all voters expect and require. With a return to minority government Labour found themselves being blocked by the opposition parties, and having to make compromises with Plaid Cymru in order to push their budget through. A sensible party with only 30 out of 60 seats would have formed (or in Labour's case, re-formed) a coalition in order to have a real majority.

    Y Senedd

    Now we see the Labour luvvies going on and on about a possible Plaid-Tory coalition. Plaid Cymru and its leader have made it absolutely clear that they would not form a coalition with the Conservatives if Plaid were the junior partners in such a coalition, ie under a Tory First Minister. "But what if the Tories were the junior partners" whinge Labour. And what if? Coalitions are the reality of PR politics, and after 8 years Labour should have learned that by now. The best they can hope for is a Lib-Lab coalition after May. Would that result in a Liberal government? Of course not. The senior party in any coalition makes a few concessions to the junior party, but it's the senior party that runs the show.

    Tuesday, 20 March 2007

    Wales and its paramilitary past

    Free Wales Army volunteer

  • The MAC


  • Mudiad Amddiffyn Cymru (Welsh Defence Movement), abbreviated as MAC, was a Welsh republican movement, modelled to some degree on the Irish Republican Army, which was responsible for a number of bombing incidents between 1963 and 1969.

    MAC was initially set up in response to the flooding of the Afon Tryweryn valley and the drowning of the village of Capel Celyn to provide water for Liverpool. Its founders were Owain Williams, John Albert Jones and Emyr Llywelyn Jones. On 10 February 1963 a transformer at the dam construction site was blown up by three men, of whom one, Emyr Llywelyn Jones was identified, convicted and sentenced to one year's imprisonment. MAC blew up an electricity pylon at Gellilydan on the day of his conviction. This led to the arrest and conviction of Owain Williams and John Albert Jones.

    The effective leadership of the organization was later taken over by John Barnard Jenkins, a non-commissioned officer in the British Army. Under his leadership, MAC is widely suspected by British police to have been behind the bombing of the Clywedog dam construction site in 1966. In 1967 a pipe carrying water from Lake Vyrnwy to Liverpool was blown up. Later the same year MAC exploded a bomb at the Temple of Peace and Health in Cardiff's civic centre, close to a venue which was to be used for a conference to discuss the Investiture of Prince Charles as Prince of Wales. In 1968 a tax office in Cardiff was blown up, followed the same year by the Welsh Office building in the same city, then another water pipe at Helsby, Cheshire. In April 1969 a tax office in Chester was the next target. On 30 June 1969, the evening before the investiture, two members of MAC, Alwyn Jones and George Taylor, were killed when a bomb they had been intending to place on the railway line at Abergele, in order to stop the Royal Train from getting through to Caernarfon, exploded prematurely. In actuality, at the time the bomb was being placed, the Royal Train had already passed Abergele and was parked at a guarded remote site. In November 1969 John Jenkins was arrested, and in April 1970 was convicted of eight offences involving explosives and sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. Although there were further bombings, there is no evidence that MAC were involved.

  • The Free Wales Army


  • The Free Wales Army (Welsh: Byddin Rhyddid Cymru) was a paramilitary Welsh nationalist organisation, formed out of Lampeter, West Wales by William Julian Cayo-Evans in 1963 as a replacement for the then supposedly moribund Mudiad Amddiffyn Cymru.


    The Byddin consisted of a number of commanding units leading a structure of ranks and volunteers. These commanding units were often isolated and worked within the tight precepts of army directives. Activities were largely limited to training in the Welsh countryside armed with surplus IRA equipment, and small–scale operations. Although the media treated this surreptitious movement with some ridicule, the authorities took them seriously enough to bring court action against the leading figures in 1969, resulting in lengthy prison sentences for them.

    Eryr Wen
    Eryr Wen

    The Army's motto was "Fe godwn ni eto", Welsh for "We shall rise again". Its crest was Eryr Wen, a white eagle mounted on dark green shield, commonly seen in shorthand.

    Their objective was to establish an independent Welsh republic which had the sole allegiance of all her citizens. The Byddin's White Eagle of Eryri symbol became a familiar sight painted on walls and bridges throughout Wales.

    The exact number of active members is unknown. Conservative estimates approximate the membership at 50, whilst at its most popular the byddin claimed a nationwide network consisting of 2000 active members and many more sympathisers. However, in August 1968 only 200 volunteers attended the Abergewsyn training camp, indicating that the actual membership was probably between the two figures.

    All volunteers wore a bottle-green peaked cap or beret with eagle crest. A bottle-green combat jacket, civilian trousers, neck scarf, combat boots, and bottle-green webbing belt rounded out the uniform for Privates and NCOs and black or leather webbing belt with peaked officers' cap for officers.

    The color of the beret and neck scarf varied depending on the area of operation of the soldier's attachment.

    General service dress uniform consisted of a dark green blazer with an eagle crest.

    The smallest unit of the army was the section, comprised of six volunteers. This was the basis of army organisation in any area. The section volunteers lived in close proximity, and were available for service at short notice. At this level the section commander (highest ranking officer) worked closely with the company adjutant to oversee operations in their Cantref.

    Four sections formed one district platoon. Four platoons formed one area company.

    So as to avoid overlap of operations the commander in chief split Wales into five areas of operation each made up of their respective Cantrefi:

    Gogledd Orllewin (North West Wales): Brown
    Gogledd Ddwyrain (North East Wales): Red
    Canolbarth (Central Wales): Green
    De Orllewin (South West Wales): Black
    De Ddwyrain (South East Wales): Blue

  • Meibion Glyndŵr


  • Meibion Glyndŵr (The Sons of Glyndŵr) was a Welsh nationalist movement violently opposed to the loss of Welsh culture and language. They were formed in response to the housing crisis precipitated by large numbers of second homes being bought by the English which had pushed up house prices beyond the means of many locals. They were responsible for setting fire to English-owned holiday homes in Wales from 1979 to the mid 1990s.

    The group first came to prominence in 1979. In the first wave of attacks, eight English-owned holiday homes were destroyed within the first month. Within the next 10 years around 220 properties were damaged by the campaign. It peaked in the late 1980s with the targeting of Conservative MPs' homes and David Hunt, the then Welsh secretary, was a target in 1990.

    Responsibility for the bombings had been taken by four separate movements: Mudiad Amddiffyn Cymru (the movement to defend Wales), Cadwyr Cymru (the keepers of Wales), Meibion Glyndŵr and The Welsh Army for the Workers Republic (WAWR). However, Meibion Glyndŵr has been the only group to have had any claim to long-term success, although since the mid-1990s this group has been inactive and Welsh nationalist violence has ceased, at least on an organisational level.

    Siôn Aubrey Roberts
    Siôn Aubrey Roberts

    A reinvestigation into postal bombings led to the conviction of Siôn Aubrey Roberts with the use of DNA testing in 1993. Many cases still remain unresolved.

    It has been claimed in recent times, that they were in fact an MI5 front, or run by agents provocateurs. Evidence for this theory is not forthcoming.

    Activities:

    1979-94: Meibion Glyndŵr fire-bomb around 220 English-owned homes.

    1989: Meibion Glyndŵr declared that "every white settler is a target". The group also placed incendiary bombs in Conservative party offices in London and estate agents' offices in London, Liverpool, Sutton Coldfield and Haverfordwest.

    1990: Poet and priest R. S. Thomas calls for a campaign to deface English-owned homes.

    1993: Siôn Aubrey Roberts, an alleged member of Meibion Glyndŵr, was jailed for nine years for sending letter bombs to Conservative politicians.

    Saturday, 17 March 2007

    The Welsh longbow

    Y Saethydd Cymreig

    Archaeological evidence in Britain can trace the use of the longbow as far back as 3000 BC and its use was widespread throughout Europe. The longbow may not have had a continuous life of use and development from then until now. It seems unlikely that the Celts and Romans didn't know of its existence and used it on a small scale. Viking restrictions regulated the number of bows and arrows to be provided for peasants. In the year 633, Offrid, the son of Edwin, King of Northumbria, was killed by an arrow in battle with the Welsh and the Mercians. It's not certain the arrow was from a Welsh longbow but this is an early account of the use of the longbow by the Welsh archers in military action. The story promotes the belief which credits the Welsh with inventing and introducing the longbow into the British Isles. The acknowledged expert on the longbow, Robert Hardy, has written:"If the Welsh did not have bows yet, it cannot have been long before they adopted the weapon from the raiding Danes, but it is more than likely that, however they first came by it, the Welsh, among all the tribes in the British Isles, either retained the use of the bow from much earlier times, or invented it for themselves long before there could have been any chance for them to have learned of its use from the Scandinavians."

    Until the 17th century there was no regular permanent army in Britain. Archers were part of temporary armies during battles throughout the 13th, 14th and 15th centuries. Post battle armies were disbanded and archers returned to their homes and communities. When required again an archer was conscripted or recruited by the feudal gentry.

    The death of Offrid in 633 by an arrow from a longbow precedes its widespread use hundreds of years later by the armies of the English and Norman rulers. There is reliable evidence of its military use by the Welsh in an ambush of invading Saxon horsemen in the Welsh mountains by Welsh longbow archers in 1054. The archers shot so accurately and strongly that the Saxons fled before they could throw their spears. At the siege of Abergavenny in 1182, Welsh archers, using longbows, pierced an oak door four inches thick with their arrows and William de Braose was hit by a Welsh arrow. This arrow went through his chainmail, into his thigh, through the saddle and penetrated the horse he was riding. King Edward I recognised that the Welsh archers excelled in the use of the longbow and this was developed by the use of this superb weapon by the Welsh during the military campaigns of the 13th, 14th and 15th centuries. South East Wales was where the best longbowmen were found but others were recruited from as far away as Pembroke. At the battle of Falkirk in July 1299 Edward's army was victorious principally because of the devastating effects of the Welsh longbow archers. The longbow made a significant debut at the battle of Crecy, France in 1346 and changed the way battles were fought thereafter. Edward III called on his Welsh allies who contributed 3,000 of the 6,000 arches who faced the enemy knights. These well-trained Welsh bowmen could 'loose' about 10 arrows a minute. At any moment thousands of arrows would be hissing through the air, looking, as one observer at the time put it, 'so thick that it seemed like snow'. The longbow archers fired volleys of arrows, travelling like a "swarm of bees", rapidly making a decisive advantage over the French crossbow which took longer to 'draw' and slower to shoot arrows.

    Achery was like a religion. The Welsh longbow archer played a critical role in the battle of Agincourt. On 25 October 1415, Welsh longbow archers under King Henry V completely destroyed the French cavalry at Agincourt .


    The powerful longbow in the hands of a skilled and experienced archer stirred dread in the minds of their enemies. With a large draw weight (pull), a well made arrow could travel between 180 and 200 yards and pierce armour and chainmail. No wonder the longbow archer was feared by his enemies across Europe for three centuries. The feared Medieval longbow archers usually used a two-fingered draw on the string and if captured, the French soldiers would cut off these two drawing fingers. However in close combat it was common for longbow archers to taunt their enemy by holding up their two fingers.

    Source: Longbows, Arrows and the Origin of Fletchers

    Foreword

    Owain Glyndŵr

    Original Foreword

    I'm a Welsh Nationalist, but this isn't a blog solely about independence, though the cause for Welsh Independence will be a key ingredient. Likewise it is not a blog solely about politics, though politics will play the lead role in it, I'm sure (especially in the run up to the Assembly elections this May). This is also a blog against defeatism, against the idea that Wales is a defeated nation. The Saxons couldn't defeat us. The Normans needed 216 years, the most advanced technology in warfare at the time, and a lot of luck to take away our sovereignty, bankrupting Europe in the process. And still we rose again. Even afterwards our warriors -employed by the Normans because of their experience in battle- were recognised as the most hard assed bastards in Europe. You only had to say the words "Welsh bowman" to make a seasoned French knight shit his armoured breaches back then. A lot of us seem to have forgotten this, and seem to border on being apologetic for being Welsh. Wales is not England's bitch.

    I'm also a pro-European, but without being a "Yes-man" to Brussels, so European matters will also pop up.


    Revised Foreword

    OK, this is a political blog. I'm a Welsh Nat, mostly but not exclusively left-of-centre. I'm not currently a member of any party so I don't have to tow any line, but do I vote and support Plaid Cymru.